Horror Films: A Necessary Evil?
Brutal killings, grisly beheadings, sadistic rapes…no, it’s not the 6 o’clock news, it’s what’s playing at the local cineplex. Or are they one and the same?
Gruesome horror movies have made a comeback in recent years, and teenagers are flocking to the theaters to see them, in spite of – or maybe because of – their R ratings. What’s the appeal? Could these movies be a reflection of the cruel reality we see on CNN and Fox News every day?
Think about it. Over the past few years, the 24/7 news channels have brought us 9/11, the BTK Killer, Natalee Holloway, child kidnappings, brutal terrorists, suicide bombers, and gruesome beheadings in Iraq. And that’s just the tip of the terrifying iceberg. Perhaps filmmakers feel compelled to make movies that reflect what’s happening in the real world. But why do we feel compelled to see these ugly events again on the big screen?
Maybe because it helps us deal with the horrifying realities in the world and provides a cathartic way to process tragedy and human loss. And since the standard plot of most horror movies includes good prevailing over evil, maybe these movies give us hope that it will happen in real life, too.
More horror after the jump!
CROSSING THE LINE?
But are filmmakers crossing the line? When “Chaos” was released in 2005, movie-goers left the theater filled with despair and futility. At the end of the film, the lone survivor was the evil one who’d murdered innocent characters in a variety of sadistic ways. As the screen goes dark, we hear his satanic laughter and realize there’s no rhyme or reason for his behavior. He isn’t playing out the forces of a heinous childhood as Aileen Wuornos did in 2003’s “Monster”. Nor is he seeking revenge, as the parents did in Ingmar Bergman’s “The Virgin Spring” (1960). He’s simply killing for the sake of killing.
Roger Ebert gave “Chaos” a zero-star rating, noting that the film was “an exercise in heartless cruelty that ends with careless brutality. The movie denies not only the value of life, but the possibility of hope.”
Ebert added that he believes evil can win in fiction, as it often does in real life, “but I prefer that the artist express an attitude toward that evil. It’s not enough to record it; what do you think and feel about it? Your attitude is as detached as your hero’s. If ‘Chaos’ has a message, it is that evil reigns and will triumph. I don’t believe so.”
Steven Jay Bernheim, producer of “Chaos,” responded this way: “Real evil exists and cannot be ignored, sanitized or exploited. It needs to be shown just as it is…and if this upsets you, disquiets you, or leaves you saddened, that’s the point.”
A RETURN TO THE SLASHER MOVIES
If being upset, disquieted, and saddened is indeed the point, we’ve had plenty of opportunities lately. Recent years have brought us “The Devil’s Rejects,” about a family of redneck serial killers; “High Tension,” about two young women terrorized in the woods; “The Ring,” about folks who are literally scared to death; “The Grudge,” about a lethal curse passed around like a cold virus; and “House of 1000 Corpses,” about teenagers imprisoned by serial killers.
“When a Stranger Calls,” “The Hills Have Eyes,” “Wolf Creek,” “Saw II” (etc.), and “Hostel” – all of which hark back to the graphic slasher movies of the 1960s and ’70s (think “Night of the Living Dead,” “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre,” and “Halloween”).
For several years, filmmakers offered us a breed of movies that spoofed the horror genre, such as Kevin Williamson’s “Scream” and its two sequels. These movies winked at the horror genre, providing irony and humor, and audiences responded by laughing.
But Tom Ortenberg, president of Lions Gate Films, which has released several grisly horror movies in recent years, says he believes splatter movies are making a comeback, and this brand of horror is alluring because “it’s got touches of realism that audiences today can relate to.”
“We’re never going to outspend the competition in the marketing or production of a movie,” adds Ortenberg. “We’re not going to blow people away with the latest million-dollar special effects. What we can do as well or better than the studios, perhaps in retro fashion, is a realistic, gut-level, visceral horror movie that doesn’t rely on special effects, and audiences are responding to that.”
And they’re clearly slapping down their $7.50 to see these movies. “Saw II,” for example, had a budget of $4 million and has grossed more than $87 million. That’s not bad for a horror movie.
HORROR THROUGH THE YEARS
The first horror movie, 1896’s “Le Manoir Du Diable (aka “The Devil’s Castle”), made by French filmmaker Georges Melies, was only three minutes long and contained some elements of vampire films to come. Later horror films grew out of a number of sources, including witchcraft, folk tales with devil characters, fables, myths, ghost stories, and Gothic or Victorian novels from literary giants like Mary Shelley and Bram Stoker.
Through the years, horror films have given us axe murderers, flesh-eating zombies, sadistic killers, mutant babies, possessed girls, and every other sort of ghost, vampire, monster, and alien designed to scare us out of our wits. Horror movies deal with our most primal fears: our nightmares, vulnerability, alienation, fear of death and dismemberment, loss of identity, terror of the unknown, and the horror that resides in all of us.
A MESSAGE OF HOPE
Movies have the power to change the way we think. Done well, horror movies can educate us, give us hope, help us deal with the harsh realities of life and death, and offer a cathartic experience in a world gone seemingly mad. And maybe THAT is the point. To look evil straight in the eye and know that we can survive and find goodness in the world.
The question is, how much of the evil and brutality in our world today is being perpetrated by the generation that was raised on “Elm Street” and wore “Jason” costumes for Halloween? And is this new trend of horror films going to exacerbate the evil that walks among us?
Photos: The Grudge, Poster Art, Sony Pictures Entertainment, 2004; Chaos, Cover Art, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, 2005; Hostel Director’s Cut, Cover Art, LionsGate, 2008
Related Stories
POSTED IN: Celebrity Pictures, Crime, Drama, Film Genres, Film Industry, Horror, Independent, Movie Stars, Mystery, Now on DVD, Personalities, Science Fiction, Thriller
5 opinions for Horror Films: A Necessary Evil?
Jeanne
Mar 5, 2008 at 1:21 am
This was a really good read. As a horror fan, I do have to say, however, that “No Country For Old Men” scared me sooooo bad. I’m not even lying.
I think it all depends on what you think is scary. BUT… I couldn’t watch the Grudge so I do see your point about crossing a line.
Jeanne
Mar 5, 2008 at 1:31 am
Oh, I gotta add that “When a Stranger Calls” and “The Hills Have Eyes” are remakes from around the time of the original “Halloween.” “Hostel” was good but, admittedly, they injected a darkness there that even I found hard to shake. I liked it though and “House of 1000 Corpses.”
“Halloween” is my favorite of all time, though :)
Although… the “Elm Street” flicks had it all - gore, slashing and humor.
Oh, I can’t pick just one!!!!
theunrulyone
Mar 5, 2008 at 2:13 am
Hostel was disturbing, that is for sure, but it still carried that message of hope. After all, all the bad guys get their comeuppance by the end of the movie, even the guy that sent them there in the first place.
I’m a fan of old school horror, and some of the new horror movies like “Feast,” “Hatchet” and “Fido”-though that one is more of a comedy, but it is still creepy as hell.
Anyway, good article.
jim
Mar 8, 2008 at 6:46 pm
Hey Jane, do you even like the genre your reporting on? I mean, cause you don’t seem to know much behind them, or the trends that drive them. Torture is in. Just like the 80’s brought us a slew of bad slasher flicks, the new thing is torture. Just go to your local Blockbuster and look at all of the cheap Hostel knockoffs that are on the shelves. Also the super disease, end of humanity as we know it scenario is hot as well, I am Legend, 28 weeks later, and a gazillion direct to dvd copy cats.
Jane Boursaw
Mar 9, 2008 at 2:52 pm
<>
Jim - Yes! My point exactly. And my theory is that maybe we like to see it played out on the big screen and *resolved, whereas in real life, it’s rarely ever resolved and just leaves us feeling empty and wondering why.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: